Is it possible to configure IFS Applications 10 to respond on the standard SSL port 443 instead of the default port (like 48080), so the port number doesn't need to appear in the application URL?

All FAQ questions / Security and access

Answer

Rather than reconfiguring MWS itself to bind directly to port 443, put a Load Balancer in front of it configured as a TCP-type load balancer with its listener set to port 443, forwarding traffic through to MWS on its normal internal port. This is the recommended architecture for suppressing the port number from the public-facing URL while leaving MWS itself running on its standard port behind the load balancer.

Documentation-based answer. Confirm the product and release before applying it. This answer has not been verified in an IFS environment.

← Browse Security and access questions